11-27-2007, 08:52 PM
11-28-2007, 04:09 PM
For my niche it is definitely Pay per action. Although I find it harder to get paid via PPA than PPC. Since you have no power over your visitor after they have clicked on the ad, a lot depends on the affiliate merchant's sales page. But PPA is definitely worth the trouble in terms of pay.
11-29-2007, 08:08 AM
If the rate of getting ‘actions’ successfully is very high, PPA works well; it pays better; otherwise, PPC. Generally speaking, it’s easier to set up a PPC site.
11-30-2007, 12:14 PM
online.education Wrote:
If the rate of getting ‘actions’ successfully is very high, PPA works well; it pays better; otherwise, PPC. Generally speaking, it’s easier to set up a PPC site.
hehe, you say it as if you make your website just for ads...
Anyways, I think it's much harder to earn with PPA, but it pays a lot more.
01-22-2008, 03:18 PM
I think PPC is better for a new site, which people might not trust and want to buy something from a site that there is an od of. But for something like a blog with a community where there is trust in between the members and admin PPA could be quite successful
02-09-2008, 11:37 AM
Depends. Blogs and forums are better for PPA, whilist sites work better with PPC (such as adsense). This is because forums and blogs have members who can get ad blindness, so might as well get paid more when a member does click 

08-23-2008, 06:34 AM
PPA completely as you get payed quicker in my opinion and also not everyone clicks on ads partly because sometimes they might think it could be a virus you know people these days lol